Wisconsin presidential election polls

★ Leaning Democrat ★
10
of 538 electoral votes

Which candidate is leading in Wisconsin?

Polling average based on four-way race (%)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Jul 13, 2016 Nov 7 Aug Sep Oct 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Jul 13, 2016 Nov 7 Aug Sep Oct 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Jul 13, 2016 Nov 7 Aug Sep Oct 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Jul 13, 2016 Nov 7 Aug Sep Oct 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Jul 13, 2016 Nov 7 Aug Sep Oct 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton 40.3 Trump 46.8 Clinton

The chart above displays the two leading presidential candidates, Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump. Two other candidates with significant support are Libertarian Gary Johnson, who is polling at 5.8 per cent, and Jill Stein of the Green Party, who is polling at 2 per cent. Read about our methodology.

Who won past presidential races in Wisconsin?

Wisconsin National
Year Margin of victory (pts) Margin of victory (pts)
2012 Obama
+6.9 Obama
+3.9
2008 Obama
+13.9 Obama
+7.3
2004 Kerry
+0.4 Bush (G.W.)
+2.5
2000 Gore
+0.2 Bush (G.W.)
+0.5
1996 Clinton (B.)
+10.3 Clinton (B.)
+8.5
1992 Clinton (B.)
+4.4 Clinton (B.)
+5.6
1988 Dukakis
+3.6 Bush (G.H.W.)
+7.7
1984 Reagan
+9.2 Reagan
+18.2
1980 Reagan
+4.7 Reagan
+9.7
1976 Carter
+1.7 Carter
+2.1
1972 Nixon
+9.7 Nixon
+23.2

Key data about Wisconsin

Economic and demographic indicators relative to the national average (%). Darker lines indicate multiple states with similar values.

Wage growth

4.4% Wisconsin -2.8%min 4.4%US 6.7%max

Unemployment rate

4.1% Wisconsin 2.9%min 4.9%US 6.9%max

Poverty rate

12.1% Wisconsin 8.2%min 13.5%US 22%max

College educated

27.4% Wisconsin 18.7%min 29.3%US 53.4%max

Hispanic population

6.6% Wisconsin 1.5%min 17.6%US 48%max

African-American population

6.6% Wisconsin 0.6%min 13.3%US 48.3%max

All individual polls

Date Pollster Clinton / Trump (%) Clinton TrumpSample*
Nov 1 - 2 Remington Research (R) 49 / 41 49% 41%2,720 LV
Oct 31 - Nov 1 Loras 44 / 38 44% 38%500 LV
Oct 26 - 31 Marquette 46 / 40 46% 40%1,225 LV
Oct 30 - 30 Remington Research (R) 46 / 42 46% 42%1,172 LV
Oct 26 - 27 Emerson 48 / 42 48% 42%400 LV
Oct 20 - 22 Remington Research (R) 46 / 41 46% 41%1,795 LV
Oct 15 - 18 Monmouth 47 / 40 47% 40%403 LV
Oct 13 - 16 WPR, St. Norbert 47 / 39 47% 39%644 LV
Oct 6 - 9 Marquette 44 / 37 44% 37%878 LV
Oct 5 - 7 CBS News, YouGov 43 / 39 43% 39%993 LV
Oct 4 - 5 Loras 43 / 35 43% 35%500 LV
Oct 4 - 4 Gravis 48 / 40 48% 40%1,102 RV
Sep 19 - 20 Emerson 45 / 38 45% 38%700 LV
Sep 15 - 18 Marquette 41 / 38 41% 38%677 LV
Aug 27 - 30 Monmouth 43 / 38 43% 38%404 LV
Aug 25 - 28 Marquette 41 / 38 41% 38%650 LV
Aug 4 - 7 Marquette 47 / 34 47% 34%683 LV
Jul 7 - 10 Marquette 43 / 37 43% 37%665 LV
Jun 21 - 24 CBS News, YouGov 41 / 36 41% 36%993 LV

* RV indicates registered voters; LV indicates likely voters

Methodology: The FT poll tracker is based on Real Clear Politics (RCP) data and checks for new polls at least once an hour as polls are added by RCP staff.

The poll tracker is based on a four-way race, which includes Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, Republican candidate Donald Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein. In states where Stein is not on the ballot (Nevada, Oklahoma and South Dakota), a three-way polling average is used. In Utah, where independent candidate Evan McMullin is polling significantly, a five-way polling average is used.

The FT’s US election poll tracker switched from two-way polling averages to four-way polling averages on September 21 to better reflect the options available to voters.

A state is considered ‘solid’ if the difference in polling averages between two candidates is above 10 per cent; ‘leaning’ if it is between 10 and 5 per cent; and a ‘toss-up’ if it falls below 5 per cent.

Most states use a ‘winner-take-all’ method of electoral college vote allocation. Maine and Nebraska, however, use an alternative method called the congressional district method in which the state is divided into congressional districts and the winner of each district takes that district’s electoral vote. The winner of the statewide vote is awarded two electoral votes.

Sources: Real Clear Politics, The Green Papers, US Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Produced by: Steve Bernard, Joanna S. Kao, Luke Kavanagh, Callum Locke, Claire Manibog, Caroline Nevitt, Tom Pearson, Ændrew Rininsland, and Martin Stabe.